Wolves raised almost £100m through sales over the 2024 summer transfer window, parting ways with three players.
Max Kilman, Pedro Neto and Daniel Podence bid farewell to the Midlands club during the window, seeing the Old Gold bring in millions.
It was a victory for the club to acquire the profit they did on the three players although, a similar narrative remained in that the trio were not replaced.
Podence’s case can be excluded from such belief, as the task of replacing key figures such as Neto and Kilman was a near-impossible challenge for Gary O’Neil and Matt Hobbs to pull off.
Added to the requirement of replenishing their options on the pitch, Wolves were aware of the financial boundaries that Premier League clubs must strongly adhere to, as Julen Lopetegui found out last summer.
This year was not so much a problem of complying with PSR, but more of the club’s inability to replace those who departed, despite the profit generated through the sales.

Wolves have ‘capacity’ to post a 2024/25 loss without breaching PSR
It’s simple enough for the issues on the pitch that come from offloading key players to be understood however, finances in football are slightly harder to digest.
That’s why Molineux News spoke to Adam Williams, TBR’s Head of Football Content, Business, Finance & Governance, to discuss what Wolves’ summer business in 2024 means for the bigger picture.
“Wolves generated enough profit on player sales in 2023-24 to fall within the Premier League’s three-year, £105m PSR threshold,” Williams explained.
“The margins were tight and they didn’t have much breathing space for the financial year.”
Williams went on to explain that despite there being another loss projected to come from the 2023/24 accounts, Wolves are in a good position to avoid a PSR breach nonetheless.
“We won’t have access to the accounts for 2023-24 until early next year, but the projections I’ve seen from the likes of Swiss Ramble show that their losses will be restricted to around the £10-15m mark.
“Add that figure to the £67m they lost in 2022-23, which is now the last year of the three-year PSR calculation, and you can see that they have capacity to post another loss in 2024-25 and remain within the threshold.
“In reality, PSR-allowable expenses like youth investment will mean that they have more wriggle room than the raw financials suggest.”
Wolves will be ‘very confident’ of dodging a PSR breach
Funds spent on academy costs can be deducted from a club’s financial PSR calculations, reinforcing that the numbers that we see regarding profit and loss aren’t conclusive.
Certain costs count towards profit and loss but not towards PSR, with a lot to consider when revising the bigger picture of a club’s financial status following something as financially impactful as the summer transfer window.
Following such narrative, Williams explained how there is more than meets the eye when it comes to the profit Wolves made from their sales this summer.

“Remember, profit on player sales is offset against their amortised value in the books – which is based on their original transfer fee divided by the years remaining on their contract – so the headline figures of nearly £100m in sales don’t tell the full story.
“But counterbalancing that, you have the fact that any profit on player sales counts towards your profit-loss and therefore your PSR calculation immediately, whereas the costs of new signings are amortised over five years.
“That is a long-winded way to say that Wolves will be very confident of avoiding a PSR breach this season and have the capacity to spend if the owners decide.
“Whether they do or not is an entirely different story. PSR capacity is a different thing to cash.
- READ MORE: Wolves’ most expensive transfers of all time
“Look at it this way – just because you have a £10,000 limit on your credit card, doesn’t mean you should max it out.”
A lot of Wolves’ capacity to spend in upcoming windows will have to do with the financial backing that the club get from Fosun.
As we know, this is far from guaranteed although, there is a positive to take from the evaluation in that the Old Gold aren’t at risk of breaching PSR.
The freedom to spend is there for O’Neil and Hobbs in the near future, if funds can be released by the owners.